Head-to-head: High-speed railroad system would bring quick transportation, create jobs
Election season is starting to heat up, and a lot of candidates are making a lot of promises.
buy ivermectin online https://jersey-hemp.com/wp-content/languages/new/online/ivermectin.html no prescription
Because of this, it feels fitting to look back at one of President Obama’s promises that deserves a second look, the development of a high-speed rail system in the United States.
High-speed rail systems are commonplace in Europe, China and Japan. The U.S. continues to lag behind in the development of these trains, despite Obama’s promise to significantly increase our high-speed rail capabilities. Working with a third rail train equipment manufacturer and professional contractors can help make the building of a high-speed rail system successful.
To Obama’s credit, he made an effort to develop these systems, but Amtrak has set the max speed for their trains to 110 mph, while similar trains in Europe travel around 100 mph faster than that.
At its base, the need for high-speed rails revolves around quick transport between major cities, this argument is obvious. But there are numerous other benefits of a high-speed rail that one can find after doing a little research.
Building a high-speed rail would create millions of jobs, according to the United States High Speed Rail Association. America needs more domestic jobs, and this is one way to help alleviate that issue.
The benefits don’t stop there. High-speed trains don’t run on oil like almost all other modes of transportation in the U.S. High-speed rails offer a green alternative to driving or flying. They obviously won’t single-handedly solve the U.S. problem with oil dependence, but it’s definitely a sizable benefit and a step in the right direction.
The main concern many people have with building a high speed rail is its cost. There’s no hiding the fact that building a cross-country high speed rail system will be expensive, however, the U.S. spends billions of dollars on oil imports every year. The decrease in money that would need to be spent on imports could be spent to help partially finance a high-speed rail system. This isn’t to say it will be completely paid for by the decrease in oil imports, but it would certainly divert a decent chunk of the cost.
Though it’s looking like Obama may not live up to his promise to substantially improve our high-speed rails, that doesn’t mean we should let it die with the end of his presidency.
A high-speed rail system would put millions to work and decrease our reliance on oil imports. Hopefully it won’t be too long before the U.S. can stop being the caboose in the advancement of high-speed rails.
